Leading, Slipping, Gaining, Lagging Analysis:
Assessing Utilities Employment Growth
Across Alabama Counties
Utilities
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Utilities
Employment Growth
Alabama:
2010-2022 = -0.41%
2022 = -0.39%
Borrowing from an approach that sometimes appears in the finance sections of the popular press, LSGL analysis is a handy and versatile way to compare, portray and classify the patterns of utilities employment growth across all of Alabama's 67 counties. In finance, this technique is used for comparing and assessing the market performance of individual securities or across industry sectors. For example, the performance of the 30 stocks contained within Dow are compared with one another over the past week in contrast to their performance over the past month using the Dow's respective averages as the points of reference.
Here in this Alabama Regional Economic Analysis Project report, we adopt this approach to gauge and compare the utilities employment growth of Alabama's 67 counties over the latest available year (2022) against the backdrop of their growth over the long term period (2010-2022). In so doing we classify their growth and performance into 4 broad categories: Leading, Slipping, Gaining and Lagging.
Utilities
Employment Growth
County vs Statewide Average: 2010-2022 and 2022
Utilities
Employment Growth
Alabama:
2010-2022 = -0.41%
2022 = -0.39%
This figure displays the 67 counties of Alabama as dots on a scattergram, with the vertical axis representing the average annual utilities employment growth rate over the long-term period (2010-2022), and the horizontal axis representing the utilities employment growth rate for the near-term (2022).
This figure sets apart those counties whose long-term utilities employment growth exceeded the statewide average of -0.41%, by portraying them in the top two quadrants demarcated at -0.41% on the vertical axis. County whose long-term average annual utilities employment growth rate trailed the statewide average (-0.41%) are distributed in the bottom two quadrants. In all, 22 counties surpassed the statewide average over 2010-2022, while 6 counties fell below.
Similarly, the two quadrants on the right of this figure present the positions of the 23 counties whose most recent (2022) utilities employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (-0.39%). The two quadrants on the left feature those 5 counties whose utilities employment growth over 2022 trailed the statewide average.
Accordingly, each quadrant portrays the performance of all 67 counties corresponding with their long-term (2010-2022) and near-term (2022) performance relative to their respective statewide averages of -0.41% over 2010-2022 and -0.39% over 2022:
Leading counties () (top-right quadrant)...are counties whose average annual utilities employment growth rate surpassed the statewide average both long-term (-0.41%) and near-term (-0.39%).
Slipping counties () (top-left quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual utilities employment growth rate exceeded the statewide average (-0.41%), but whose near-term growth has "slipped" by falling below the Alabama average (-0.39%).
Gaining counties () (bottom-right quadrant)...are counties whose long-term average annual utilities employment growth rate fell below the statewide average (-0.41%), but whose near-term growth has "gained" by registering above the average (-0.39%) statewide.
Lagging counties () (bottom-left quadrant)...are counties whose average annual utilities employment growth rate fell under the statewide average both long-term (-0.41%) and near-term (-0.39%).
   
 
Summary of Alabama's 67 County Totals
 
Short Term Average
 
 
Below
(-0.39%)
Above
(-0.39%)
 
Long
Term
Average
Above
(-0.41%)
4
18
22
Below
(-0.41%)
1
5
6
 
5
23
28
 
   
Leading Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Leading Counties
white dot
Alabama:
2010-2022 = -0.41%
2022 = -0.39%
Turning attention to the top-right quadrant from the discussion above, this figure features the distribution of the Alabama counties classified as Leading. These counties surpassed Alabama's average annual utilities employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = -0.41%) as well as near-term (2022 = -0.39%). Each is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual utilities employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Alabama's 67 counties, 18 (27%) are classified within the Leading () category. Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Slipping Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Slipping Counties
Alabama:
2010-2022 = -0.41%
2022 = -0.39%
This figure depicts the distribution of the 4 Alabama counties classified as Slipping (top-left quadrant), in that their long-term average annual utilities employment growth rate outpaced the average statewide (2010-2022 = -0.41%), while they trailed the statewide average near-term (2022 = -0.39%). Again, each county is identified by it's corresponding ranking based on its average annual utilities employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Only 4 (6%) of Alabama's 67 counties are classified as Slipping (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Gaining Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Gaining Counties
white dot
Alabama:
2010-2022 = -0.41%
2022 = -0.39%
This figure shows the distribution of the 5 Alabama counties classified as Gaining (bottom-right quadrant), in that their long-term average annual utilities employment growth rate posted below the average statewide (2010-2022 = -0.41%), while they outpaced Alabama's average near-term (2022 = -0.39%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on its average annual utilities employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
Of Alabama's 67 counties, only 7% (5) are featured as Gaining (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
Lagging Counties
2022 vs. 2010-2022 Averages
Lagging Counties
white dot
Alabama:
2010-2022 = -0.41%
2022 = -0.39%
This figure depicts the distributions of the 1 Alabama county classified as Lagging (bottom-left quadrant). These counties trailed the statewide average annual utilities employment growth both long-term (2010-2022 = -0.41%) as well as near-term (2022 = -0.39%). Again, each county is identified by its corresponding ranking based on it's average annual utilities employment growth rate over 2010-2022.
1% of Alabama's counties, 1 of 67, are characterized here as Lagging (). Those counties ranked by their long-term average include:
   
 
Alabama
Utilities Employment Growth
County vs. Statewide Average
 
2010-2022
 
2022
 
 
Leading Counties
 
21
-0.38
 
25
0.00
95
 
10
1.38
 
11
3.27
347
 
5
2.23
 
18
1.92
106
 
7
2.03
 
25
0.00
24
 
13
0.79
 
4
6.57
146
 
4
2.75
 
12
3.17
130
 
2
6.99
 
1
39.42
191
 
8
1.83
 
25
0.00
53
 
6
2.16
 
24
0.43
232
 
1
47.69
 
25
0.00
1
 
14
0.51
 
17
2.22
46
 
11
1.05
 
5
6.25
34
 
20
-0.33
 
19
1.85
495
 
19
-0.10
 
10
3.77
55
 
3
2.99
 
8
4.17
125
 
12
0.94
 
7
5.74
129
 
22
-0.39
 
25
0.00
39
 
17
0.29
 
15
2.55
241
Slipping Counties
 
18
0.17
 
35
-4.94
77
 
16
0.34
 
34
-2.25
87
 
15
0.47
 
33
-0.69
4,737
 
9
1.64
 
32
-0.68
145
Gaining Counties
 
26
-2.00
 
20
1.84
221
 
24
-1.69
 
14
2.78
74
 
28
-4.57
 
21
1.59
64
 
25
-1.74
 
23
0.74
136
 
23
-0.66
 
3
8.68
839
Lagging Counties
 
27
-3.20
 
31
-0.41
1,209
Undefined/Suppressed Counties
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
9
3.92
53
 
U
U
 
36
-8.60
85
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
27
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
13
2.81
585
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
25
0.00
29
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
76
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
5
6.25
136
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
2
31.58
25
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
16
2.27
90
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
22
1.27
160
 
U
U
 
37
-22.37
170
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
U
U
 
S
S
S
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-0.41
 
-0.39
13,475
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0.23
 
2.40
605,600
November 2023
REAP_PI_CA1500N_510300_LSGL
 
   
Analysis Options Menu
Select Year Interval
to
Select Alternative Industry
Highlight a Region (Optional)
Copyright © 2024. Pacific Northwest Regional Economic Analysis Project (PNREAP). All Rights Reserved.

Please stay tuned...
while your request is processing:

Please wait while your request is being processed...
To offer the most comprehensive set of interactive options in support of your research, AL-REAP calculates and crunches most of the data and generates the narrative and graphic analysis on demand in response to your request.
Your request will soon be available.
Just a few more seconds....Your request has been generated and is now loading the results.